Mutton, M. E., & Gilbride, K. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will incompatible relationship (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). If the I’m not beautiful, are you beautiful or otherwise not?: Physical-attractiveness studies and you will dating choice since the a purpose of a person’s own appeal. Emotional Technology, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]
Levinger, G., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in-marriage or other intimate dating. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will in conflict relationships (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Number of aspiration. For the J. McV. Take a look (Ed.), Identification while the behavior disorders (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Drive. [ Backlinks ]
Loving, T. J. (2006). Anticipating dating relationships future which have insiders’ and you can outsiders’ perspective: Just who and you will what is questioned issues. Private Matchmaking, 13, 349-362. [ Website links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you may relationship top quality for the newlyweds: Several founded strategy. Diary off Personality and you can Social Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Website links ]
Legitimizing situations in the initiation from heterosexual relationships
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A great. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Elizabeth. Roentgen. (2006). Recognized similarity and you may relationship triumph one of relationship partners: An enthusiastic idiographic means. Diary from Societal and personal Matchmaking, 23, 865-880. [ Hyperlinks ]
Madden, Meters., & Lenhart, A good. (2006). Online dating. Washington, DC: Statement into the Pew Sites & Western Life Venture. Recovered , regarding [ Backlinks ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Examining the precision away from predictions regarding the dating matchmaking: How and why would lovers’ forecasts differ from men and women from perceiver? Character and you can Personal Therapy Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Links ]
This new destination-resemblance theory one of mix-sex family: Relationships pleasure, observed parallels, and you can notice-offering thinking
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Papers demonstrated within Very first Around the globe Appointment into the Private Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]
Merkle, E.Roentgen., & Richardson, R.A good. (2000). Electronic matchmaking and digital relating: Conceptualizing desktop mediated intimate matchmaking. Loved ones, 49, 187-192. [ Website links ]
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Are real similarity very important to attraction? A good meta-investigation out of real and you will detected similarity. Diary from Societal and private Relationship, 25, 889-922. [ Links ]
Morry, M. Yards. (2005). Relationships pleasure since an excellent predictor off similarity studies; A test of one’s interest-similarity hypothesis. Journal from Social and personal Relationships, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Links ]
Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and you may extension of one’s SVR idea of dyadic combining. Diary regarding ily, forty-two, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will divorce: An excellent 14-12 months longitudinal study of black partners and you will white people. Record out-of Societal and private Dating, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]
Orenstein, S. (). The fresh love formula Meets believes it has got receive an algorithm for ruling the internet dating providers: A technical approach to finding Mr. or Ms. Right. Team dos.0 Journal. Retrieved into out-of [ Hyperlinks ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent endure – Identification parallels from inside the lovers. Character and you can Individual Distinctions, 45, 533-535. [ Backlinks ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Companion preferences: What properties do group desire within brief-term intimate and you will enough time-identity personal people? Diary regarding Therapy and you can Individual Sex, a armenia women in america to marry dozen, 1-21. [ Hyperlinks ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). New role of your own mind in the initiation and span of personal telecommunications. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may incompatible matchmaking (pp. 209-231). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
